China cosmetics tests: 45 batches fail, 21 on microbial counts

· Policy · Multi-platform

Unlabelled cream jars, sunscreen tubes, petri dishes and a pH probe on a pale green lab bench
Cream jars, sunscreen tubes and test equipment on a laboratory bench. Image: CMB

China’s National Medical Products Administration (国家药品监督管理局, NMPA) has named 45 batches of cosmetics that failed its 2026 national sampling tests. Twenty-one failed on microbial counts and 15 sunscreen batches failed on sunscreen ingredients, according to Notice No. 36 of 2026, published on 15 October 2026.

Notice No. 36 lists 45 batches found in the 2026 national sampling

The NMPA notice says the batches were tested by the Tianjin Institute for Drug Control (天津市药品检验研究院) and other institutions. The notice is dated 14 October 2026 and was posted on 15 October.

The NMPA has asked provincial regulators in Beijing, Jiangsu, Shandong, Henan, Guangdong and other places to open investigations into the registrants, filers and contract manufacturers named. Provincial regulators must order retailers to stop selling the products and trace their sources.

NMPA Notice No. 36 of 2026: key details
ItemDetail
Issuing bodyNational Medical Products Administration (NMPA)
Document numberNotice No. 36 of 2026 (2026年第36号)
Issue date14 October 2026 (posted 15 October 2026)
Effective dateNot stated in the notice
Scope45 batches from the 2026 national cosmetics sampling programme
Legal basis citedCosmetics Supervision and Administration Regulation and two NMPA measures on production, sale and sampling
Note: Effective date not specified in the notice. Source: NMPA, ‘Notice on 45 batches of non-compliant cosmetics (No. 36 of 2026)’.

Twenty-one batches failed on microbial counts

Twenty batches exceeded limits for total aerobic bacterial count and one exceeded the limit for moulds and yeasts. The failures include face masks, body wash, shampoo, conditioner and two toothpastes, which China regulates under cosmetics rules.

The highest bacterial count listed was 820,000 CFU per gram for an anti-wrinkle face mask, against a limit of 1,000 CFU per gram. The two toothpastes recorded 20,000 and 30,000 CFU per gram, against a limit of 500.

Microbial counts and sunscreen ingredients account for most failed batches

Unit: batches

Number of batches by failed test item · Source: NMPA, 15 October 2026

View as table
ItemValue
Total aerobic bacterial count20 batches
Sunscreen ingredients differ from registration14 batches
pH value6 batches
MCI/MI preservative above limit3 batches
Moulds and yeasts1 batches
Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate above limit1 batches

Fifteen sunscreen batches failed on sunscreen ingredients

Fourteen sunscreen batches failed an ingredient comparison test. In these products, sunscreen agents stated in the registration documents were not detected, or agents not stated were detected, such as octocrylene.

One further sunscreen contained 13.8 percent ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate on retest, above the 10 percent limit. Sunscreens are special-use cosmetics in China and require registration before sale.

Six whitening or freckle-removing creams failed pH limits

Six batches failed on pH value, all sold as whitening or freckle-removing products. Readings ranged from 4.4 to 7.01, each outside the range stated for that product.

Three rinse-off products, two shampoos and a body wash, exceeded the 0.0015 percent limit for the preservative mix methylchloroisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI). The highest reading was 0.01065 percent.

Selected test results against limits
Product typeTest itemResultRequirement
Anti-wrinkle face maskTotal aerobic count820,000 CFU/g≤1,000 CFU/g
ToothpasteTotal aerobic count30,000 CFU/g≤500 CFU/g
Whitening sunscreen SPF50+Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate13.8% (retest)≤10%
ShampooMCI/MI0.01065%≤0.0015%
Whitening serumpH value4.45.0–6.5
Note: Requirements are as listed for each product in the notice annex. Source: NMPA, ‘Notice on 45 batches of non-compliant cosmetics (No. 36 of 2026)’, annex.

Fourteen batches were sampled from Douyin, Pinduoduo and Tmall shops

The annex names an online shop for 14 of the 45 sampled sellers. On a simple count of those names, seven were Douyin shops, four Pinduoduo shops and three Tmall shops.

By the stated location of the registrant, filer or distributor, 39 batches were labelled as from Guangdong. One batch, a whitening essence lotion sold through a Pinduoduo store, was labelled as imported from Japan.

Douyin shops accounted for half of the 14 online sampling points

Unit: batches

Number of batches by sampled seller, as named in the annex · Source: NMPA, 15 October 2026; CMB count

View as table
ItemValue
No online shop named31 batches
Douyin shops7 batches
Pinduoduo shops4 batches
Tmall shops3 batches

How the figures were compiled

  • Source: NMPA Notice No. 36 of 2026 and its annex listing 45 batches.
  • Test-item counts follow the annex’s “non-compliant item” column; each batch has one listed item.
  • Channel counts are CMB’s count of sellers whose annex entry includes an online shop name (网店商铺名称).
  • Product names in the annex are as labelled; the notice says these are “labelled” names and details.
  • Some results are marked as retest results in the annex.

Read next